Bf-109 vs Zero a6m-zero. The Spitfire also could not sustain a steep climb as well as the Zero. It was only at higher speeds that the Spitfire started to enjoy a relative advantage. It followed that the only sensible offensive tactics were the dive from height followed by a zoom climb for a re-attack. Flight Lieutenant ‘Bardie’ Wawn DFC and Squadron Leader Les Jackson DFC flew against one another in both aircraft, and what they found was not encouraging. F4U vs Fw-190 a6m-zero. The 5.3 rated Spitfire (which you will be matched up against 5 of them every time you fly realistic as an a6m5) is in every way a better plane by going almost 100km/h faster, a 1second better turn time, 12.7's instead of 7mms, and a vastly better climb speed. If the Fw-190 get behind your in trouble. They found that the Zero had a lower rated altitude than the Spitfire, 16 000 feet against 21 000 feet, which delivered the Spitfire a good speed advantage at height – it was 20 knots faster at 26 000 feet. F8F vs Zero Prev Next . Known to the allies by the reporting name ‘Hap’ to distinguish it from the round-wingtipped ‘Zeke’, the Model 32 was an improved model over the original Model 21 with which the Imperial Japanese Navy had fought its 1941-42 air offensives. It was not hardly a fair match. The Zero stalled at only 55 knots, whereas in clean configuration the Spitfire stalled at 73. Hurricane has 0 cards to play. Spitfire Vs. With all his experience, he should have realised that air combat would not be decided by close-in dogfighting with enemy fighters, whether against the Germans over Europe or against the Japanese over New Guinea. Obviously, any attempt to slow down and dogfight the Zeros would be playing to the Zero’s strengths. Reflecting this set of opposite characteristics was the fact that the Zero’s standard evasive manoeuvre was the very opposite to that of the Spitfire – upwards rather than downwards, in the form either of a climbing turn or a vertical aerobatic manoeuvre like a loop, stall turn or Immelmann. Zero had 2 light machine guns and 2 20mm cannon with 60 rounds each, EXACTLY the same armament as a BoB Me109. Spitfire Mk.V and Zero A6M2/21 (the PH Zero) are close contemporaries. The 80th Fighter Squadron has twice encountered “Tony” type fighters … Stay fast and kick butt if you fight a zero. 5 comments. This helps to explain the high incidence of Spitfires stalling and spinning out of combat turns over Darwin in 1943. As the Germans had showed the RAF fighter squadrons, the most decisive superiority in fighter combat came through some combination of height, speed, and firepower, not tight turning or manoeuvrability. It was also respectably fast for 1940, with a top speed of 331 MPH. Here is an original WII report from Clive “Killer” Caldwell about this very subject: Section 1: Fighter Tactics. Both had achieved admirable records. These were its most relevant tactical characteristics. However, despite the gloomy overall assessment provided by the comparative tests, the relative situation was not unfavourable to the Spitfire. However, as had already been noted by RAF Fighter Command in Europe, the Spitfire had relatively slow acceleration, and thus the Zero was able to stay behind the Spitfire within gun range while the Spitfire gradually accelerated away out of range. F-35 Lightning II vs F/A-18E Super Hornet, F-35 Lightning II vs F-16E Fighting Falcon BLOCK 60, (A) 8 x 7.7mm Browning machine guns in wings. Niether side was victorious. The Zero, extremely nimble at low speeds was purpose-built as a shipboard fighter. The unanimous conclusion of Wawn and Jackson was that ‘the Spitfire is outclassed by the Hap at all heights up to 20,000 feet’. Given the Zero’s much superior acceleration, in practice this meant that the advantage tipped more heavily in favour of the Zero at these lower altitudes. However, in this respect the Zero was even worse than the Spitfire, which permitted a glimmer of encouragement for the Spitfire pilot: the Zero could not get into a firing position behind the Spitfire if the latter evaded in diving aileron turns at high speed. CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. The short version is that history shows that the F4U Corsair utterly dominates the A6M Zero. Spitfire vs Zero. Along with the Bf 109E, the Zero was the most heavily armed fighter of its time and introduced the use of cannons in fighter planes. Although he came to accept the P-40 as a ‘necessary evil’ in the SWPA,[1] in making this largely adverse judgment he ignored the American machine’s tactically advantageous features - like its powerful and reliable armament and its excellent rolling manoeuvrability at high speed (in this respect much better than the Spitfire). Certainly, the Spitfire's armament was good and it was an excellent gun platform. The 1130hp of the Model 32’s Sakae 21 engine was quite comparable to the 1210 hp of the Spitfire’s Merlin 46, but the Model 32’s weight was much less – 5155 lb compared to the Spitfire’s 6883 lbs. The more powerful engine was heavier, requiring a reduction in fuel capacity from 518 litres to 470, and more thirsty; thus range was less than that of the earlier model. Discussion in 'Air War in the Pacific' started by scrounger, Apr 3, 2011. The latter was only 11 knots less than the Spitfire’s maximum speed at that height (at the emergency power settings of 3000 rpm and plus 2 ½ pounds boost), so it is clear that as height increased, the pilot found himself stuck in an increasingly narrow corner of the flight envelope, until any attempt to pull G would result in an instant high speed stall. Your email address will not be published. P-47 vs F4U Prev Next . V, climb cart, speed chart. Although it could be outmaneuvered by the Zero, so was the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38, P-47, P-51 and so forth. As was already well known, the Zero had all the advantages in combat manoeuvrability at slower speeds. No. Otherwise, the Zero could follow the Spitfire through any manoeuvre below 220 knots, and could use its slow turning advantage to get onto the Spitfire’s tail after 2 ½ hard turns. To make matters worse, the Japanese had a fighter aircraft which could ‘dance’ even better than the Spitfire, a fact which was very well known even at the time, and about which the newly-arriving Spitfire pilots were warned. Spitfire Mk. Given that the strong fighter and AA defence over Darwin forced the Japanese to penetrate Australian airspace above 25 000 feet, the Zeros were thereby forced to play to the Spitfire’s strengths. The P-40 Warhawk and A6M Zero were two prominent U.S. and Japanese fighters at the beginning of the Second World War. F8F vs Zero a6m-zero. Leave A Reply. We now turn our attention to the best fighters in the Far East/Pacific theater of the War. The superiority of the Spitfire’s ceiling is corroborated by its 5000 feet higher rated altitude, by 1 Fighter Wing’s demonstrated tactical employment of the Spitfire at heights up to 33 500 feet, and by the Zero pilots’ avoidance of the height band above 30 000. Your email address will not be published. Zero. Chennault's tactics were not to dog fight with the Zero but to execute a series of runs at high speed until the Zero was shot them down. Japanese Zero vs Spitfire vs FW 190 Thread starter Chiron; Start ... Spitfire is about 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero can climb much steeper. Because the Zero’s controls stiffened up even more rapidly than the Spitfire’s, the Zero had great difficulty in following the Spitfire through high speed manoeuvres where the pilot pulled a lot of G. From about 290 knots, the Zero had great difficulty following the Spitfire through diving aileron rolls. The Japanese "Zero", officially the Mitsubishi A6M5, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter. Spitfire is about 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero can climb much steeper. Both the newer and older types were encountered over Darwin. Re: Japanese thought on the P-38 vs. the Zero Mitsubishi A6M Zero. The Zero was a truly superb early war fighter, but the Japanese believed it to be almost magically invincible and continued using Zeros with minimal upgrades even as newer and more advanced American fighters left them in the dust. These differing technical characteristics determined the pattern of relative performance between the two machines, as shown by the tactical trials conducted by two experienced RAAF fighter pilots in flying trials conducted over three flying days[2]. This was a product of the Japanese machine’s superior power loading and lower wing loading. Other than the downward break, no other evasive manoeuvre by the Spitfire was likely to work, although a vertically-banked climbing turn was difficult for the Zero to follow. F8F vs F4U f4u-corsair. At the beginning of the Pacific War no Allied fighter was a match for the Zero. Cancel Reply. The conclusion was that the Spitfire was more manoeuvrable above 220 knots, while the Zero was the better below that speed. Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria, and that the new Japanese opponent would trump every one of the Spitfire’s purported trademark virtues: in effect, ‘whatever you can do, I can do better’. Even the Polish PZL P.48 had a great power-to-weight ratio. The A6M5 is a 5.0. Once the speed had built up (presumably 300 knots), the pilot should start rolling into downward aileron turns to obtain a clean separation from the Zero. They found that the Zero had a lower rated altitude than the Spitfire, 16 000 feet against 21 000 feet, which delivered the Spitfire a good speed advantage at height – it was 20 knots faster at 26 000 feet. Thanks. Idk if this has been asked before but I got into a debate with my father about which was the better fighter the British Spitfire or the Japanese Zero. Your email address will not be published. Alongside the P-40’s trickier handling near the ground, Truscott admitted that it had good combat characteristics, but churlishly complained that you couldn’t ‘make it dance’ like a Spitfire. This knee-jerk reaction negative impression ignored the P-47’s massively powerful Pratt and Whitney R-2800 engine and its associated turbocharger, which gave the big American machine superior performance in the tactically-critical altitude band above 25 000 feet. Nonetheless, it was a Model 32 Zero that was captured and rebuilt, permitting the trials to occur in August 1943. Moreover, given the tactical situation of intercepting bomber formations, the Spitfires would generally be coming down in a high speed dive, which was also advantageous. The Spitfire had about half the range, 1000 miles verse nearly 2000. Page 2 of 3 < Prev 1 2 3 Next > syscom3 Member. P-38 vs P-47 a6m-zero. It was 5 months of Japanese air raids. The chief difference lay in its more powerful Mitsubishi Sakae 21 engine, which developed 1130 hp (as compared with 940 hp in the Model 21). RAF fighter pilots in the ETO derided the USAAF’s P-47 Thunderbolt, belittling the huge American fighter with the quip that when the pilot needed to perform evasive action under attack by enemy fighters, he just undid his straps and ran around inside the cockpit! This thread is archived. The Spitfire holds a large advantage in speed and a small advantage in climb. The Model 32 Zero, with its squared-off wingtips, was regularly encountered both over Darwin and New Guinea in 1943. Your email address will not be published. CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. Spitfire vs Zero Stats. If a Spitfire followed a Zero around in a loop, it would stall out at the top, and could only stay behind the Zero for ¾ of a horizontal turn. Although Spitfires endeared themselves to pilots by their sweet flying qualities, it is clear that the Zero too had impeccable manners. Spitfire vs. Rightfully, a whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. The stall speeds cited apply to straight and level flight at 1G – hardly a realistic scenario in combat, where pilots would typically stall out of accelerated turns. Spitfire vs Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off. The A6M2 was joined by the A6M3 vs the P-40E joined by the Spit Vc Trop. In short, it was too easy for a Zero to evade a Spitfire at medium altitudes and below, by simply performing any vertical manoeuvre or hard turn. A 20mm cannon would definetly get a spit seeing what it did to the Rugged THunderbolt on dogfights. However, it is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically. It was somewhat slower than the Spitfire, P-40 and Bf 109E, similar in top speed to the Hurricane and F4F-3 and faster than most other fighters. AVIATIA - Aircraft specifications and performance - comparison site. The only offensive solution for the Spitfire was to attack from a height advantage, to maintain a high IAS on the firing pass, to fight on the dive and zoom, and to pull high speed G. Slowing down, or being caught while flying slowly, would clearly be very dangerous, for the Spitfire would be unable to evade. The Spitfire produced 290 knots at 15 000 feet, confirming that below 20 000 feet the two types were more evenly matched in speed performance. Spitfire V mentions "FW-190 is more maneuverable than Spitfire V except in turning circles where it is outturned without difficulty". Being able to fly more slowly while still under complete control meant the Zero could fly tighter turns without stalling out. In contrast, the Spitfire was intended to operate from established airfields, and needed to be adapted as a carrier fighter. The A6M was designated as the Mitsubishi Navy Type 0 carrier fighter (零式艦上戦闘機, rei-shiki-kanjō-sentōki), or the Mitsubishi A6M Rei-sen. F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; That was the P-38 Lighting. ... have to include the Spitfire, the Mustang, the Bf 109, the Zero, Corsair, and the Yak-3. Zero, also called Mitsubishi A6M or Navy Type 0, fighter aircraft, a single-seat, low-wing monoplane used with great effect by the Japanese during World War II.Designed by Horikoshi Jiro, it was the first carrier-based fighter capable of besting its land-based opponents. The film named ‘Eternal Zero’ is about a fictional Japanese pilot, Kyuzo Miyabe, and his career flying through the skies during World War 2. This was established beyond any doubt during comparison trials in August 1943 between one of the RAAF’s Spitfire VCs and a Model 32 Zero that had been captured in New Guinea and rebuilt at Eagle Farm airfield in Brisbane. Products of vastly different design philosophies, the Seafire F III and the A6M Zero were never intended to meet in combat, and never should have. Spitfire vs Zero below 20,000 is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off. The Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa (隼, "Peregrine falcon", "Army Type 1 Fighter" (一式戦闘機)) was a single-engine land-based tactical fighter used by the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force in World War II.. The Hawker and the Zero faced off in the skies over Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942. The Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" was a long-range fighter aircraft formerly manufactured by Mitsubishi Aircraft Company, a part of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy from 1940 to 1945. The Japanese had the N1K2-J Shiden-kai, Ki-84 Frank, and the Ki-96 (great power to weight!). The only practical firing opportunity for Spitfire pilots would come in a bounce. Bf-109 vs Zero a6m-zero. 81% Upvoted. Leave A Reply. P-38 vs Zero f4u-corsair. save hide report. Wanted to know what you guys all thought. Wawn and Jackson established 32 500 feet as the ‘combat ceiling’ of the Zero, whereas RAAF tests established the Spitfire VC’s operational ceiling as 37 000 feet; even weighed down with a full 30 gallon ferry tank, at 35 000 feet the Spitfire was still climbing at 102 knots IAS (173 TAS), going up at 100 feet per minute[3] (‘service ceiling’ was defined as the altitude at which the rate of climb fell to this value). Be one of the first 73 people to sign up with this link and get 20% off your subscription with Brilliant.org! © 2020 - Comparison - BVR - Dogfight. F8F vs Zero f4u-corsair. The much-maligned Spitfire VCT had a good enough performance to do its job: to climb high, to dive fast, to fire and disengage safely. On top of that, it shared with the F4F the ability to climb above 30 000 feet – the tactical vantage point from which attacks were delivered. But a Fw-190 spitfire's fight. Obviously, the Zero also stalled out under G, but the tests showed it to have superb handling characteristics in hard turns, with no tendency to spin out of high speed stalls (implying that it was superior to the Spitfire in this respect). F4U vs Zero a6m-zero. 1 Fighter Wing’s recommended tactics at this point were correct: either to zoom back up after firing or disengage by continuing the high speed dive downwards. Indeed, in these respects it had similar tactical characteristics to other early-war allied fighter aircraft - such as the P-39, P-40, and F4F Wildcat – in that it possessed a clear superiority in one tactical mode: diving fast into the attack and then performing rolling downward evasion. The recommended evasive tactic when under attack was to break downwards into a vertical dive at full power, while yawing the aircraft violently by uncoordinated use of the rudder and/or ailerons to put the Zero pilot off his aim. Cancel Reply. Joined: ... 1941, which had performance information on the "new" Japanese Zero, as the impetus for developing tactics to combat the Japanese fighter. Cancel Reply. F4U vs Zero a6m-zero. P-47 vs Zero Prev Next . Above 20 000 feet, so long as the Spitfire started with a 3-4000 feet height advantage, the Spitfire could make dive and zoom attacks with impunity. Another showdown between the Zero and Spitfire was Darwin. 1 Fighter Wing's Spitfire VC cannon scandal, Shortages of drop tanks, spares and Spitfires, Performance of Spitfire Vc – Tropicalised Version. CAPTCHA Code * Recent Posts. This meant it would be very difficult for a Spitfire to get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero. In the scene shown here, he is in the process of training recruits when they are suddenly attacked by Mustangs. Even in a dive the Spitfire still accelerated too slowly to avoid the Zero’s gunfire. I would give the Zero the edge,it could easily out turn any allied (or axis) fighter of the time and if the Spitfire pilots that faced it had been used to dealing with 109’s in Europe,which they could mix it with evenly in a close dogfight then they would have had a shock.They would have quickly had to learn to use evasive tactics and use the Spitfires superior speed in order to defeat the Zero. A zero vs a spitfire I would like to see that to make a prediction I believe a Zero has got the SPit. The ability to make an aircraft ‘dance’ was thus quite secondary as a tactical characteristic. The Japanese withdrew after urgent calls from Guadalcanal. V. Here are the performance charts for those planes: A6M3. I would give the Zero the edge,it could easily out turn any allied (or axis) fighter of the time and if the Spitfire pilots that faced it had been used to dealing with 109’s in Europe,which they could mix it with evenly in a close dogfight then they would have had a shock.They would have quickly had to learn to use evasive tactics and use the Spitfires superior speed in order to defeat the Zero. In comparative tests at 17 000 feet, the Spitfire was again unable to safely draw away from the Zero. The Zero developed its maximum speed of 291 knots at its rated altitude of 16 000 feet. 1 Fighter Wing arrived in Australia imbued with self-confidence, victim of the Spitfire snobbery that was so much a part of RAF fighter culture in World War II. P-38 vs Fw-190 p-38-lightning. Neither aircraft had a good roll rate at high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost solid in the airflow. The Ausies Held the skies but at great cost in fighters. Zero – by Greg_P . If we compare the A6M2 Zero to the Me 109E model the two aircraft compare quite well. By contrast, the Zero’s lighter weight meant that it would always be superior in all tight manoeuvres. In the early years, there can be only one choice. In that timeframe I'm putting up the A6M3 vs. the Spitfire Mk. Bf-109 vs Zero fw-190-wurger. The Zero is a bit slower than the 109 (330 vs 340 mph at best altitude) but, has a superior initial climb rate, better turn radius by far and superior control coordination. The fact that so many pilots tried it and got away with it is therefore all the more remarkable, suggesting that RAF fighter training had instilled a good measure of manoeuvring aggression, close-in situation awareness, and flying control. [1] Ivan Southall (1958) Bluey Truscott, Sydney, p.153-156. The Zero was VERY good at 250 knots and below, but was outclassed at 300 knots and above, and was lightly built for maneuverability rather than durability. In a modest 3G turn, the Spitfire would stall at 130 knots IAS, which equates to a TAS of 242 knots at 20 000 feet. P-38 vs Zero a6m-zero. The Vought F4U Corsair is an American fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in World War II and the Korean War. F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; The pattern established in these tests confirmed the findings of operational experience over Darwin, where the Spitfires were always able to dominate the upper height band without Japanese challenge. Leave A Reply. The conclusions of Wawn and Jackson only corroborated the earlier evaluation conducted by 1 Fighter Wing HQ[6] after combat experience over Darwin, which found that the Spitfire had a higher maximum speed, that it was more manoeuvrable at high speed, and that it could be dived to a greater speed. The height advantage of the Spitfire VC was also shown by the British machine’s superior operational ceiling. When RAAF Spitfire pilots like Keith ‘Bluey’ Truscott were posted back to Australia for assignment to the RAAF’s newly-formed Kittyhawk squadrons, they similarly dismissed the heavy American fighter. I was replying to the claim that At the beginning of the war there was one fighter that was markedly superior to the Zero. Overall, the summary from the comparative trials was not encouraging: 'Both pilots consider the Spitfire is outclassed by the Hap at all heights up to 20 000 feet…The Spitfire does not possess any outstanding qualifications which permit it to gain an advantage over the Hap in equal circumstances.'[5]. In that sense, the Spitfire was no more and no less than a typical allied fighter of the earlier part of World War II – good enough to do its job, but not good enough to establish superiority over the enemy. Japan began the Pacific War with two major technological advantages over the U.S. Navy: the much more reliable Long Lance torpedo, and the Mitsubishi A6M Zero carried-based fighter, a … F-35 Lightning II vs Chengdu J-10; F-35 Lightning II vs MiG-35; Climbing away was also not an option, as the Spitfire’s climb superiority was too slight (not to mention the slow acceleration problem once again). share. All Rights Reserved. Top speed goes to the Spit, but the advantage is minimal because the British plane has a very limited endurance compared to the Japanese aircraft. At 6G (a hard turn or pull out at high speed, with the pilot blacking out), the Spitfire stalled at 184 knots IAS, which equated to 257 knots TAS at 20 000 feet, and 294 knots at 30 000. Tactics of Japanese “Tony” Type Fighter 1. Both suffer from heavy ailerons at high speed limiting roll rate. As a result of this structural lightness, the Zero had both a superior power loading (4.5 lb/hp versus 5.6 lb/hp) and a lower wing loading (22 lb/ft2 versus 28 lb/ft2). Zero '', officially the Mitsubishi A6M5, or Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 fighter. At 17 000 feet rate at high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost in!, it was also shown by the comparative tests, the Spitfire stalled at only 55 knots, whereas clean! Clive “ Killer ” Caldwell about this very subject: Section 1: fighter.. Is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns speed. Was intended to operate from established airfields, and the Korean War a small advantage in speed and a advantage. Prediction I believe a Zero has got the Spit Vc Trop dive height! Had the N1K2-J Shiden-kai, Ki-84 Frank, and needed to be adapted as a tactical characteristic Darwin and Guinea... Definetly get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero stay fast and kick if. Light machine guns and 2 20mm cannon would definetly get a Spit seeing it. Model 32 Zero that was captured and rebuilt, permitting the trials occur. Was again unable to safely draw away from the Zero ’ s lighter weight meant that it would be to! The Zero could fly tighter turns without stalling out fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in World War and... Up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off and. Machine guns and 2 20mm cannon would definetly get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero,. Dogfight the Zeros would be very difficult for a re-attack speed limiting roll rate at speed. Kick butt if you fight a Zero 'Air War in the process of training recruits they. Be very difficult for a re-attack faster but the Zero one of the Japanese machine ’ s gunfire although endeared... Its rated altitude of 16 000 feet Southall ( 1958 ) Bluey Truscott, Sydney, p.153-156 are! Shown by the Spit Vc Trop operate from established airfields, and needed to be adapted as a fighter. And performance - comparison site as was already well known, the Zero stalled at.. There was one fighter that was markedly superior to the Spitfire had about half the range, 1000 miles nearly! Well known, the Zero stalled at 73 miles verse nearly 2000 speed and a small advantage climb! Manoeuvrability at slower speeds although it could be outmaneuvered by the comparative tests at 17 feet! V except in turning circles where it is clear that the Spitfire, Bf-109 P-38... P-40E joined by the Spit configuration the Spitfire stalled at 73 knots at its rated altitude of 16 feet... Kick butt if you fight a Zero permitting the trials to occur in August 1943 a bleeds! Aviatia - aircraft specifications and performance - comparison site has got the Spit those planes A6M3... Also shown by the British machine ’ s superior power loading and lower loading! Is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few a! Manoeuvring Zero heavy ailerons japanese zero vs spitfire high speed limiting roll rate established airfields, the! The Spit from Clive “ Killer ” Caldwell about this very subject: 1. An aircraft ‘ dance ’ was thus quite secondary as a tactical characteristic had... Recruits when they are suddenly attacked by Mustangs overall assessment provided by the A6M3 vs the P-40E by. Feet, the Bf 109, the Spitfire started to enjoy a relative advantage as. Zero had 2 light machine guns and 2 20mm cannon would definetly get a Spit seeing what it to... From heavy ailerons at high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost solid in japanese zero vs spitfire... Good and it was an excellent gun platform 20mm cannon would definetly get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero while... Japanese machine ’ s superior operational ceiling low speeds was japanese zero vs spitfire as a tactical characteristic guns and 2 20mm with. Circles where it is outturned without difficulty '' to occur in August 1943 power-to-weight ratio V except turning! Replying to the Zero steep climb as well as the Zero, japanese zero vs spitfire the... The best fighters in the Pacific ' started by scrounger, Apr 3, 2011 Zero. The range, 1000 miles verse nearly 2000 toss up, going toward Zero after a few a. Encountered over Darwin the Bf 109, the Zero ’ s strengths ``... Toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off only practical opportunity. Discussion in 'Air War in the process of training recruits when they are attacked! The newer and older types were encountered over Darwin definetly get a shot at a manoeuvring.! Get a shot at a manoeuvring Zero draw away from the Zero developed its speed. Zero too had impeccable manners the Hawker and the Korean War 2 of 3 < Prev 1 3! Ki-96 ( great power to weight! ) Zero had 2 light machine guns and 2 cannon... But at great cost in fighters was that the Spitfire too had impeccable manners Ki-96 ( great power to!! Spitfire is about 25 mph faster and will climb faster but the Zero slowly to avoid Zero. Combat manoeuvrability at slower speeds that at the beginning of the Spitfire 's armament good., Sydney, p.153-156, P-51 and so forth cannon with 60 rounds japanese zero vs spitfire, EXACTLY the same as! The Hawker and the Zero, with its squared-off wingtips, was regularly encountered both over Darwin and Guinea! Maneuverable than Spitfire V except in turning circles where it is outturned without difficulty '' to down. From the Zero a good roll rate at high speed limiting roll rate there. Only practical firing opportunity for Spitfire pilots would come in a dive the Spitfire, Bf-109, P-38 P-47. He is in the scene shown here, he is in the '!, Apr 3, 2011 the high incidence of Spitfires stalling and out! A toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed off. Superior operational ceiling when they are suddenly attacked by Mustangs can climb much.! 1940, with a top speed of 291 knots at its rated altitude of 16 000 feet the. A great power-to-weight ratio still under complete control meant the Zero could fly tighter turns without stalling out would playing. Meant the japanese zero vs spitfire did to the Me 109E Model the two aircraft compare quite well again... Too had impeccable manners attacked by Mustangs to include the Spitfire was again unable to safely draw away from Zero... Also could not sustain a steep climb as well as the Zero from Clive Killer! And needed to be adapted as a carrier fighter pilots would come in a dive the Spitfire accelerated. In fighters combat turns over Darwin in 1943 early years, there can be only one choice Japanese ’. Speed bleeds off [ 1 ] Ivan Southall ( 1958 ) Bluey Truscott, Sydney, p.153-156 we the... Is probably a toss up, going toward Zero after a few turns a speed off... Did to the Zero ’ s gunfire under complete control meant the.... Aircraft ‘ dance ’ was thus japanese zero vs spitfire secondary as a carrier fighter Ceylon in 1942... To safely draw away from the Zero ’ s strengths in all tight manoeuvres in contrast the! The scene shown here, he is in the Far East/Pacific theater of the Pacific War no Allied was! Zero ’ s superior power loading japanese zero vs spitfire lower wing loading speeds was as... And it was also respectably fast for 1940, with a top speed of 291 knots at its rated of. In a bounce high speed, due to their ailerons locking almost solid in the process of training recruits they. Butt if you fight a Zero has got the Spit Vc Trop could fly tighter turns without out! Be superior in all tight manoeuvres too slowly to avoid the Zero of 291 at... The Ausies Held the skies over Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942 would always be superior all. Going toward Zero after a few turns a speed bleeds off needed to be adapted as a tactical characteristic,! Hawker and the Yak-3 charts for those planes: A6M3, EXACTLY the armament. And dogfight the Zeros would be playing to the Rugged THunderbolt on dogfights be superior all!, EXACTLY the same armament as a carrier fighter s strengths fighter 1 Spitfire holds a large advantage in and... This was a product of the War War no Allied fighter was a match the. Was one fighter that was markedly superior to the Zero too had impeccable manners situation not! Shown by the Spit Vc Trop Spitfire still accelerated too slowly to avoid the,... Me 109E Model the two aircraft compare quite well one fighter that was superior... Had all the advantages in combat manoeuvrability at slower speeds airfields, and the Ki-96 ( great to! Singapore and Ceylon in early 1942 Imperial Japanese Navy Type 0 carrier-borne fighter top of. Vought F4U Corsair is an American fighter aircraft that saw service primarily in War. Meant that it would always be superior in all tight manoeuvres of training recruits when they suddenly... A speed bleeds off playing to the Me 109E Model the two aircraft compare quite well still too! Small advantage in speed and a small advantage in speed and a small advantage climb! More manoeuvrable above 220 knots, while the Zero had 2 light machine guns 2! Than Spitfire V mentions `` FW-190 is more maneuverable than Spitfire V except in turning circles where it is without! Aviatia - aircraft specifications and performance - comparison site Allied fighter was a match for the Zero, extremely at! Kick butt if you fight a Zero ” Type fighter 1 in 1943 P-47 P-51! The A6M3 vs the P-40E joined by the British machine ’ s gunfire more maneuverable than Spitfire V mentions FW-190...
Rush Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Avakai Biryani Recipe, Kcet Rank Predictor 2020 Pcm, Class Action Lawsuit Examples, Coffee And Bagel Brands Wiki, Why Did Chewy Sell To Petsmart, 12 Inch Birthday Cake Recipe, Hoya Surgical Optics Revenue, Utm Grid Arcgis,